Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Graceville, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Graceville, FL.

Data Snoqualmie Graceville
Population 13,621 2,175
Median Age 38.6 years 31.7 years
Median Income $186,353 $36,625
Married Families 53.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 3% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville

  • In Snoqualmie, the population is higher at 13,621, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
  • Residents in Snoqualmie have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
  • Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
  • The unemployment rate in Snoqualmie is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.

Demographics

Demographics Snoqualmie vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Snoqualmie Graceville
Black 1 32
White 77 59
Asian 11 1
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 7 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville

  • In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
  • Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 59% in Graceville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 1% in Graceville.
  • Graceville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Snoqualmie at 7% compared to 2% in Graceville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Graceville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Snoqualmie Graceville
Mental Health Not Good 14.1% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 13.2%
Depression 23.9% 22.2%
Smoking 7.3% 24.4%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 15.8%
Obesity 21.9% 33.6%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville

  • In Graceville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
  • Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
  • Graceville has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Snoqualmie Graceville
No Schooling 0.2% (34) 2.7% (58)
High School Diploma 5.8% (792) 25.3% (550)
Less than High School 1.5% (209) 22.5% (490)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.3% (6,177) 15.2% (331)

Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville

  • In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
  • In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.