Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Graceville, FL.
Data | Snoqualmie | Graceville |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,621 | 2,175 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 31.7 years |
Median Income | $186,353 | $36,625 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville
- In Snoqualmie, the population is higher at 13,621, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Snoqualmie have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Graceville.
- The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- The unemployment rate in Snoqualmie is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Snoqualmie | Graceville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 32 |
White | 77 | 59 |
Asian | 11 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 1% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Snoqualmie at 7% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Graceville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Graceville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 13.2% |
Depression | 23.9% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 7.3% | 24.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 21.9% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Graceville has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Snoqualmie | Graceville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 2.7% (58) |
High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 25.3% (550) |
Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 22.5% (490) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.