Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Belmont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Belmont, CA.
| Data | Snoqualmie | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,621 | 26,773 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $186,353 | $185,944 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Belmont
- The population in Belmont is higher at 26,773, compared to 13,621 in Snoqualmie.
- The median age in Belmont is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $185,944 in Belmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 50.0% in Belmont.
- Snoqualmie has a higher poverty level at 3% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- Belmont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Belmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snoqualmie | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 77 | 45 |
| Asian | 11 | 30 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Belmont
- In Belmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- In Belmont, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 11% in Snoqualmie.
- Belmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Belmont at 9%, compared to 7% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Belmont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 21.9% | 20.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Belmont
- More residents in Snoqualmie report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 15.5% in Belmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 7.3% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Belmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Snoqualmie at 21.9% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Belmont at 8.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snoqualmie | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 0.9% (234) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 6.0% (1,604) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 5.2% (1,394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 51.4% (13,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Belmont
- In Belmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- In Belmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 6.0% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Belmont at 5.2%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- In Belmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 45.3% in Snoqualmie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.