Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Avenal, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Avenal, CA.
| Data | Snoqualmie | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,621 | 13,374 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 30.4 years |
| Median Income | $186,353 | $51,902 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 26% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 9.5 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Avenal
- In Snoqualmie, the population is higher at 13,621, compared to 13,374 in Avenal.
- Residents in Snoqualmie have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 30.4 years in Avenal.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $51,902 in Avenal.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 31.0% in Avenal.
- The poverty level is higher in Avenal at 26%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- Avenal has a higher unemployment rate at 9.5% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Avenal provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snoqualmie | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 77 | -6 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 85 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Avenal
- In Avenal, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to -6% in Avenal.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 1% in Avenal.
- Avenal has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 85%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Avenal at 15%, compared to 7% in Snoqualmie.
- In Avenal, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Snoqualmie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 21.9% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Avenal
- In Avenal, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 17.6% in Avenal.
- Avenal has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Avenal.
- Avenal has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Avenal at 6.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snoqualmie | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 2.4% (327) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 10.6% (1,415) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 61.0% (8,153) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 3.5% (473) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Avenal
- In Avenal, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- In Avenal, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.6% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Avenal at 61.0%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 3.5% in Avenal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.