Demographics details for Sneads ferry, NC vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sneads ferry, NC vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Sneads ferry | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,140 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $40,278 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sneads ferry vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 2,140 in Sneads ferry.
- Residents in Sneads ferry have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $40,278 in Sneads ferry.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sneads ferry at 51.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 9% in Sneads ferry.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Sneads ferry.
Demographics
Demographics Sneads ferry vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sneads ferry | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sneads ferry vs Provo
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sneads ferry and Provo at 1%.
- Sneads ferry has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 69% in Provo.
- Both Sneads ferry and Provo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Sneads ferry.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 2% in Sneads ferry.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sneads ferry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sneads ferry | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sneads ferry vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Sneads ferry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 23.8% in Sneads ferry.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sneads ferry at 15.1% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sneads ferry at 18.6% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sneads ferry at 33.6% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sneads ferry at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sneads ferry | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 23.2% (496) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 17.9% (382) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (219) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sneads ferry vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Sneads ferry.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sneads ferry hold a high school diploma at 23.2% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Sneads ferry have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 10.2% in Sneads ferry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.