Demographics details for Smyrna, GA vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Smyrna, GA vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Smyrna | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,160 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $92,258 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Smyrna vs Ephrata
- In Smyrna, the population is higher at 56,160, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Smyrna have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Smyrna has a higher median income of $92,258 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Smyrna at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 8% in Smyrna.
- Ephrata has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Smyrna.
Demographics
Demographics Smyrna vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Smyrna | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 1 |
| White | 40 | 63 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Smyrna vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Smyrna at 33% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 40% in Smyrna.
- The Asian population is larger in Smyrna at 8% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 11% in Smyrna.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 7% in Smyrna.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Smyrna at 1% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Smyrna | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Smyrna vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.8% in Smyrna.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 17.4% in Smyrna.
- Ephrata has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 11.9% in Smyrna.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Smyrna.
- Ephrata has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 30.0% in Smyrna.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Smyrna and Ephrata at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Smyrna | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (203) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (4,397) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (3,139) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.0% (23,025) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Smyrna vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Smyrna.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 7.8% in Smyrna.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 5.6% in Smyrna.
- A higher percentage of residents in Smyrna hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.