Demographics details for Smithville, OH vs Kaysville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Smithville, OH vs Kaysville, UT.
Data | Smithville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,336 | 32,761 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 32.1 years |
Median Income | $69,063 | $121,867 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Smithville vs Kaysville
- The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 1,336 in Smithville.
- Residents in Smithville have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $69,063 in Smithville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Smithville at 50.0% compared to 45.0% in Kaysville.
- Smithville has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Smithville.
Demographics
Demographics Smithville vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Smithville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Smithville vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Smithville at 1% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Smithville has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 88% in Kaysville.
- Both Smithville and Kaysville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Kaysville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Smithville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kaysville at 6%, compared to 2% in Smithville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Smithville and Kaysville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Smithville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 8.7% |
Depression | 24.7% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 11.4% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Smithville vs Kaysville
- More residents in Smithville report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Smithville at 24.7% compared to 23.7% in Kaysville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Smithville at 19.7% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Smithville at 18.9% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Smithville at 37.2% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Smithville at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Smithville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (141) |
High School Diploma | 24.0% (321) | 6.1% (1,986) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (69) | 2.6% (859) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (282) | 28.5% (9,340) |
Education Levels Comparison: Smithville vs Kaysville
- In Kaysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Smithville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Smithville hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- More residents in Smithville have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 21.1% in Smithville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.