Demographics details for Smith center, KS vs Rosemead, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Smith center, KS vs Rosemead, CA.
| Data | Smith center | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,561 | 49,791 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 43.1 years |
| Median Income | $49,444 | $70,073 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Smith center vs Rosemead
- The population in Rosemead is higher at 49,791, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
- Residents in Smith center have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 43.1 years in Rosemead.
- Rosemead has a higher median income of $70,073, compared to $49,444 in Smith center.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Smith center at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in Rosemead.
- The poverty level is higher in Rosemead at 14%, compared to 10% in Smith center.
- Rosemead has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.2% in Smith center.
Demographics
Demographics Smith center vs Rosemead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Smith center | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 94 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 65 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Smith center vs Rosemead
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Smith center and Rosemead at 1%.
- Smith center has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to -4% in Rosemead.
- In Rosemead, the Asian population stands at 65%, greater than 0% in Smith center.
- Rosemead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 3% in Smith center.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rosemead at 5%, compared to 2% in Smith center.
- In Rosemead, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Smith center.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Smith center | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 12.2% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 11.0% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 21.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Smith center vs Rosemead
- More residents in Smith center report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Rosemead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Smith center at 21.7% compared to 12.2% in Rosemead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Smith center at 19.2% compared to 12.3% in Rosemead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Smith center at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Rosemead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Smith center at 38.8% compared to 21.6% in Rosemead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rosemead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Smith center | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 10.4% (5,181) |
| High School Diploma | 29.4% (459) | 17.8% (8,852) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (118) | 31.2% (15,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (231) | 16.5% (8,228) |
Education Levels Comparison: Smith center vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.4% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
- A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a high school diploma at 29.4% compared to 17.8% in Rosemead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosemead at 31.2%, compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
- In Rosemead, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 14.8% in Smith center.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.