Demographics details for Smith center, KS vs Harpswell, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Smith center, KS vs Harpswell, ME.

Data Smith center Harpswell
Population 1,561 4,912
Median Age 46.6 years 49.0 years
Median Income $49,444 $75,766
Married Families 43.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.1

Population Comparison: Smith center vs Harpswell

  • The population in Harpswell is higher at 4,912, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
  • The median age in Harpswell is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 46.6 years in Smith center.
  • Harpswell has a higher median income of $75,766, compared to $49,444 in Smith center.
  • In Harpswell, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 43.0% in Smith center.
  • Smith center has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Harpswell.
  • The unemployment rate in Smith center is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.1% in Harpswell.

Demographics

Demographics Smith center vs Harpswell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Smith center Harpswell
Black 1 1.5
White 94 97
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 0.5
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Smith center vs Harpswell

  • In Harpswell, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1.5% compared to 1% in Smith center.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Harpswell at 97% compared to 94% in Smith center.
  • In Harpswell, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Smith center.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Smith center at 3% compared to 0.5% in Harpswell.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Smith center at 2% compared to 1% in Harpswell.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Smith center and Harpswell at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Smith center Harpswell
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% Data is updating%
Depression 21.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 19.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 38.8% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 15.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Smith center vs Harpswell

  • More residents in Smith center report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Smith center at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Smith center at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Smith center at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Smith center at 38.8% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Smith center Harpswell
No Schooling 0.2% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 29.4% (459) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.6% (118) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.8% (231) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Smith center vs Harpswell

  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a high school diploma at 29.4% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • More residents in Smith center have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Harpswell.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.