Demographics details for Smith center, KS vs Barnesville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Smith center, KS vs Barnesville, GA.

Data Smith center Barnesville
Population 1,561 6,181
Median Age 46.6 years 27.7 years
Median Income $49,444 $46,116
Married Families 43.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Smith center vs Barnesville

  • The population in Barnesville is higher at 6,181, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
  • Residents in Smith center have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 27.7 years in Barnesville.
  • Smith center has a higher median income of $49,444 compared to $46,116 in Barnesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Smith center at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Barnesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Barnesville at 15%, compared to 10% in Smith center.
  • Barnesville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Smith center.

Demographics

Demographics Smith center vs Barnesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Smith center Barnesville
Black 1 48
White 94 42
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Smith center vs Barnesville

  • In Barnesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 48% compared to 1% in Smith center.
  • Smith center has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 42% in Barnesville.
  • In Barnesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Smith center.
  • Barnesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Smith center.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Barnesville at 5%, compared to 2% in Smith center.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Smith center and Barnesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Smith center Barnesville
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 13.4%
Depression 21.7% 20.3%
Smoking 19.2% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 14.1%
Obesity 38.8% 42.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Smith center vs Barnesville

  • In Barnesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.7% in Smith center.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Smith center at 21.7% compared to 20.3% in Barnesville.
  • Barnesville has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 19.2% in Smith center.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Smith center at 19.0% compared to 14.1% in Barnesville.
  • Barnesville has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 38.8% in Smith center.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Barnesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Smith center Barnesville
No Schooling 0.2% (3) 0.6% (38)
High School Diploma 29.4% (459) 20.9% (1,292)
Less than High School 7.6% (118) 7.7% (475)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.8% (231) 8.6% (534)

Education Levels Comparison: Smith center vs Barnesville

  • In Barnesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a high school diploma at 29.4% compared to 20.9% in Barnesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Barnesville at 7.7%, compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 8.6% in Barnesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.