Demographics details for Smith center, KS vs Aberdeen, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Smith center, KS vs Aberdeen, MS.

Data Smith center Aberdeen
Population 1,561 4,848
Median Age 46.6 years 41.5 years
Median Income $49,444 $46,788
Married Families 43.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 10% 22%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.4

Population Comparison: Smith center vs Aberdeen

  • The population in Aberdeen is higher at 4,848, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
  • Residents in Smith center have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 41.5 years in Aberdeen.
  • Smith center has a higher median income of $49,444 compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Smith center at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
  • The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 22%, compared to 10% in Smith center.
  • Aberdeen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.2% in Smith center.

Demographics

Demographics Smith center vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Smith center Aberdeen
Black 1 76
White 94 24
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Smith center vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76% compared to 1% in Smith center.
  • Smith center has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
  • Both Smith center and Aberdeen have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Smith center at 3% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Smith center at 2% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Smith center and Aberdeen at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Smith center Aberdeen
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 14.4%
Depression 21.7% 20.7%
Smoking 19.2% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 11.8%
Obesity 38.8% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Smith center vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Smith center.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Smith center at 21.7% compared to 20.7% in Aberdeen.
  • Aberdeen has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 19.2% in Smith center.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Smith center at 19.0% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
  • Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 38.8% in Smith center.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Smith center Aberdeen
No Schooling 0.2% (3) 0.3% (16)
High School Diploma 29.4% (459) 27.7% (1,341)
Less than High School 7.6% (118) 17.0% (822)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.8% (231) 8.7% (424)

Education Levels Comparison: Smith center vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a high school diploma at 29.4% compared to 27.7% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 17.0%, compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Smith center hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.