Demographics details for Sloughhouse, CA vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sloughhouse, CA vs Woodstock, VA.
| Data | Sloughhouse | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,135 | 5,907 |
| Median Age | 54.6 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $124,900 | $64,470 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Woodstock
- In Sloughhouse, the population is higher at 7,135, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Sloughhouse have a higher median age of 54.6 years compared to 38.4 years in Woodstock.
- Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900 compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sloughhouse at 55.0% compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 10%, compared to 6% in Sloughhouse.
- The unemployment rate in Sloughhouse is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Sloughhouse vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sloughhouse | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 6 |
| White | 57 | 60 |
| Asian | 8 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Sloughhouse.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 60% compared to 57% in Sloughhouse.
- The Asian population is larger in Sloughhouse at 8% compared to 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sloughhouse at 20% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 9% in Sloughhouse.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sloughhouse at 1% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sloughhouse | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.3% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Sloughhouse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sloughhouse | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (118) |
| High School Diploma | 7.2% (516) | 19.0% (1,121) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (640) | 17.2% (1,018) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (2,545) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 17.2%, compared to 9.0% in Sloughhouse.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sloughhouse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 16.4% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.