Demographics details for Sloughhouse, CA vs South river, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sloughhouse, CA vs South river, NJ.

Data Sloughhouse South river
Population 7,135 15,990
Median Age 54.6 years 37.1 years
Median Income $124,900 $95,981
Married Families 55.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Sloughhouse vs South river

  • The population in South river is higher at 15,990, compared to 7,135 in Sloughhouse.
  • Residents in Sloughhouse have a higher median age of 54.6 years compared to 37.1 years in South river.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900 compared to $95,981 in South river.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sloughhouse at 55.0% compared to 39.0% in South river.
  • The poverty level is higher in South river at 8%, compared to 6% in Sloughhouse.
  • South river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Sloughhouse.

Demographics

Demographics Sloughhouse vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sloughhouse South river
Black 5 7
White 57 50
Asian 8 5
Hispanic 20 30
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs South river

  • In South river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Sloughhouse.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 50% in South river.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sloughhouse at 8% compared to 5% in South river.
  • South river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 20% in Sloughhouse.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sloughhouse at 9% compared to 7% in South river.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sloughhouse and South river at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sloughhouse South river
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.4%
Depression Data is updating% 21.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 14.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 31.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs South river

  • In South river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South river at 21.0% versus 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • South river has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South river at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • South river has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sloughhouse at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sloughhouse South river
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.5% (394)
High School Diploma 7.2% (516) 18.7% (2,985)
Less than High School 9.0% (640) 20.6% (3,292)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.7% (2,545) 18.9% (3,025)

Education Levels Comparison: Sloughhouse vs South river

  • In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • In South river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South river at 20.6%, compared to 9.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sloughhouse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 18.9% in South river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.