Demographics details for Sloughhouse, CA vs Rockford, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sloughhouse, CA vs Rockford, WA.
Data | Sloughhouse | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,135 | 565 |
Median Age | 54.6 years | 50.4 years |
Median Income | $124,900 | $68,750 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Rockford
- In Sloughhouse, the population is higher at 7,135, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- Residents in Sloughhouse have a higher median age of 54.6 years compared to 50.4 years in Rockford.
- Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900 compared to $68,750 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sloughhouse at 55.0% compared to 33.0% in Rockford.
- Sloughhouse has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Sloughhouse.
Demographics
Demographics Sloughhouse vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sloughhouse | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 84 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sloughhouse at 5% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockford at 84% compared to 57% in Sloughhouse.
- The Asian population is larger in Sloughhouse at 8% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sloughhouse at 20% compared to 4% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 10%, compared to 9% in Sloughhouse.
- In Rockford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Sloughhouse.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sloughhouse | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.5% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 28.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 18.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 29.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockford at 28.8% versus 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Rockford has higher obesity rates at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Sloughhouse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sloughhouse | Rockford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.2% (516) | 11.9% (67) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (640) | 7.4% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (2,545) | 12.9% (73) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Rockford
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sloughhouse and Rockford at 0.0%.
- In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.9% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
- More residents in Sloughhouse have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sloughhouse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 12.9% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.