Demographics details for Sloughhouse, CA vs Mackay, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sloughhouse, CA vs Mackay, ID.
Data | Sloughhouse | Mackay |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,135 | 473 |
Median Age | 54.6 years | 52.2 years |
Median Income | $124,900 | $39,848 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Mackay
- In Sloughhouse, the population is higher at 7,135, compared to 473 in Mackay.
- Residents in Sloughhouse have a higher median age of 54.6 years compared to 52.2 years in Mackay.
- Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900 compared to $39,848 in Mackay.
- In Mackay, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 55.0% in Sloughhouse.
- The poverty level is higher in Mackay at 8%, compared to 6% in Sloughhouse.
- Mackay has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Sloughhouse.
Demographics
Demographics Sloughhouse vs Mackay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sloughhouse | Mackay |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 62 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 24 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Mackay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sloughhouse at 5% compared to 0% in Mackay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mackay at 62% compared to 57% in Sloughhouse.
- The Asian population is larger in Sloughhouse at 8% compared to 0% in Mackay.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sloughhouse at 20% compared to 14% in Mackay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mackay at 24%, compared to 9% in Sloughhouse.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sloughhouse at 1% compared to 0% in Mackay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sloughhouse | Mackay |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.2% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.3% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.3% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Mackay
- In Mackay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mackay at 24.3% versus 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Mackay has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mackay at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- Mackay has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mackay at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Sloughhouse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sloughhouse | Mackay |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.2% (516) | 38.5% (182) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (640) | 5.5% (26) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (2,545) | 27.7% (131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Mackay
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sloughhouse and Mackay at 0.0%.
- In Mackay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 38.5% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
- More residents in Sloughhouse have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 5.5% in Mackay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sloughhouse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 27.7% in Mackay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.