Demographics details for Sloughhouse, CA vs Graysville, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sloughhouse, CA vs Graysville, AL.

Data Sloughhouse Graysville
Population 7,135 1,885
Median Age 54.6 years 44.3 years
Median Income $124,900 $65,671
Married Families 55.0% 70.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Graysville

  • In Sloughhouse, the population is higher at 7,135, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
  • Residents in Sloughhouse have a higher median age of 54.6 years compared to 44.3 years in Graysville.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher median income of $124,900 compared to $65,671 in Graysville.
  • In Graysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 55.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Graysville.
  • Graysville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Sloughhouse.

Demographics

Demographics Sloughhouse vs Graysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sloughhouse Graysville
Black 5 43
White 57 55
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 20 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Graysville

  • In Graysville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 5% in Sloughhouse.
  • Sloughhouse has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 55% in Graysville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sloughhouse at 8% compared to 0% in Graysville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sloughhouse at 20% compared to 0% in Graysville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sloughhouse at 9% compared to 2% in Graysville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sloughhouse at 1% compared to 0% in Graysville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sloughhouse Graysville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.0%
Depression Data is updating% 24.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 19.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 38.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Graysville

  • In Graysville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Graysville at 24.8% versus 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Graysville has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Graysville at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • Graysville has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Sloughhouse.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sloughhouse Graysville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.7% (50)
High School Diploma 7.2% (516) 30.4% (573)
Less than High School 9.0% (640) 29.8% (561)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.7% (2,545) 22.8% (430)

Education Levels Comparison: Sloughhouse vs Graysville

  • In Graysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • In Graysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 7.2% in Sloughhouse.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graysville at 29.8%, compared to 9.0% in Sloughhouse.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sloughhouse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 22.8% in Graysville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.