Demographics details for Sloatsburg, NY vs Shawnee, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sloatsburg, NY vs Shawnee, KS.
Data | Sloatsburg | Shawnee |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,008 | 69,198 |
Median Age | 43.7 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $104,602 | $100,649 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Sloatsburg vs Shawnee
- The population in Shawnee is higher at 69,198, compared to 3,008 in Sloatsburg.
- Residents in Sloatsburg have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 37.9 years in Shawnee.
- Sloatsburg has a higher median income of $104,602 compared to $100,649 in Shawnee.
- In Shawnee, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 40.0% in Sloatsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Shawnee at 6%, compared to 2% in Sloatsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Sloatsburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Shawnee.
Demographics
Demographics Sloatsburg vs Shawnee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sloatsburg | Shawnee |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 7 |
White | 63 | 77 |
Asian | 4 | 3 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sloatsburg vs Shawnee
- In Shawnee, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Sloatsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shawnee at 77% compared to 63% in Sloatsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Sloatsburg at 4% compared to 3% in Shawnee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sloatsburg at 14% compared to 8% in Shawnee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sloatsburg at 9% compared to 5% in Shawnee.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sloatsburg at 4% compared to 0% in Shawnee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sloatsburg | Shawnee |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 7.8% |
Depression | 18.6% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 23.9% | 30.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sloatsburg vs Shawnee
- In Shawnee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 12.5% in Sloatsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shawnee at 19.2% versus 18.6% in Sloatsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sloatsburg at 12.0% compared to 11.6% in Shawnee.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shawnee at 19.7% compared to 17.4% in Sloatsburg.
- Shawnee has higher obesity rates at 30.5% compared to 23.9% in Sloatsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sloatsburg at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Shawnee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sloatsburg | Shawnee |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (11) | 0.7% (465) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (524) | 9.2% (6,335) |
Less than High School | 6.7% (202) | 5.3% (3,663) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.3% (912) | 32.6% (22,583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sloatsburg vs Shawnee
- In Shawnee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Sloatsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sloatsburg hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 9.2% in Shawnee.
- More residents in Sloatsburg have less than a high school education at 6.7% compared to 5.3% in Shawnee.
- In Shawnee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.6% compared to 30.3% in Sloatsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.