Demographics details for Sloan, IA vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sloan, IA vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Sloan | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,049 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $69,167 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sloan vs Whitehall
- The population in Whitehall is higher at 1,632, compared to 1,049 in Sloan.
- Residents in Sloan have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Sloan has a higher median income of $69,167 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sloan at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- The poverty level is higher in Whitehall at 7%, compared to 5% in Sloan.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 2.5% in Sloan.
Demographics
Demographics Sloan vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sloan | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 90 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | 7 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sloan vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sloan.
- Sloan has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 83% in Whitehall.
- Both Sloan and Whitehall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Sloan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whitehall at 3%, compared to 1% in Sloan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sloan at 7% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sloan | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sloan vs Whitehall
- More residents in Sloan report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 20.3% in Sloan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sloan at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 23.0% in Sloan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sloan at 36.7% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Sloan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sloan | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (4) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (234) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 1.0% (10) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (173) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sloan vs Whitehall
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sloan and Whitehall at 0.4%.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 22.3% in Sloan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 1.0% in Sloan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sloan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.