Demographics details for Sitka, AK vs Laurel, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sitka, AK vs Laurel, MD.
| Data | Sitka | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,382 | 29,352 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $95,261 | $92,035 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Sitka vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 29,352, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- Residents in Sitka have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 36.4 years in Laurel.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261 compared to $92,035 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sitka at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 9%, compared to 8% in Sitka.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Sitka vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sitka | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 52 |
| White | 57 | 11 |
| Asian | 8 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 8 |
| American Indian | 9 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sitka vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 8% in Sitka.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Sitka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sitka at 18% compared to 8% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sitka at 9% compared to 1% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sitka | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 13.1% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 31.7% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sitka vs Laurel
- More residents in Sitka report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sitka at 18.7% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sitka at 16.4% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sitka at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sitka | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (33) | 1.8% (521) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (1,396) | 10.0% (2,934) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (486) | 12.3% (3,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (2,076) | 30.9% (9,081) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sitka vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sitka hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 12.3%, compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 24.8% in Sitka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.