Demographics details for Sitka, AK vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sitka, AK vs Cincinnati, OH.
Data | Sitka | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,382 | 309,513 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $95,261 | $49,191 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Sitka vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- Residents in Sitka have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sitka at 45.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 8% in Sitka.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Sitka vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sitka | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 40 |
White | 57 | 46 |
Asian | 8 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sitka vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- The Asian population is larger in Sitka at 8% compared to 3% in Cincinnati.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sitka at 7% compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sitka at 18% compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sitka at 9% compared to 0% in Cincinnati.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sitka | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.1% |
Depression | 18.7% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sitka vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cincinnati at 21.6% versus 18.7% in Sitka.
- Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 16.4% in Sitka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 18.2% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sitka and Cincinnati at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sitka | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (33) | 0.9% (2,632) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (1,396) | 12.5% (38,643) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (486) | 9.6% (29,753) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (2,076) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sitka vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sitka hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cincinnati at 9.6%, compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 24.8% in Sitka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.