Environment details: Sitka AK
Moderate quality; well-managed resources.
Environment details: Cedar bluff VA
Poor quality; local industry impacts present.
Compare Environment: Sitka AK vs Cedar bluff VA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Sitka | Cedar bluff |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 311 | 784 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; well-managed resources. | Poor quality; local industry impacts present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.9 | 1.49 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 19 | 11 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sitka vs Cedar bluff
- Water quality is rated higher in Sitka at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Cedar bluff.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Sitka at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Cedar bluff.
- The average air quality index is worse in Sitka with 1.9 compared to 1.49 in Cedar bluff.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Sitka at 19 compared to 11 in Cedar bluff.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.