Demographics details for Sioux falls, SD vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sioux falls, SD vs Clarksdale, MS.
Data | Sioux falls | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 202,078 | 13,969 |
Median Age | 34.9 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $71,785 | $35,377 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 27% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Sioux falls vs Clarksdale
- In Sioux falls, the population is higher at 202,078, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age in Clarksdale is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
- Sioux falls has a higher median income of $71,785 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sioux falls at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 11% in Sioux falls.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Sioux falls vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sioux falls | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 86 |
White | 78 | 9 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sioux falls vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 7% in Sioux falls.
- Sioux falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Sioux falls at 2% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sioux falls at 5% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sioux falls at 6% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sioux falls at 2% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sioux falls | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 15.8% |
Depression | 19.4% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 35.8% | 50.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sioux falls vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksdale at 20.8% versus 19.4% in Sioux falls.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 16.0% in Sioux falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 35.8% in Sioux falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sioux falls | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (1,619) | 2.0% (274) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (26,548) | 9.2% (1,281) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (14,743) | 15.2% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.3% (47,034) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sioux falls vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Sioux falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux falls hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 7.3% in Sioux falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.