Demographics details for Sioux falls, SD vs Arvada, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sioux falls, SD vs Arvada, CO.
| Data | Sioux falls | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 202,078 | 121,581 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $71,785 | $106,014 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Sioux falls vs Arvada
- In Sioux falls, the population is higher at 202,078, compared to 121,581 in Arvada.
- The median age in Arvada is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
- Arvada has a higher median income of $106,014, compared to $71,785 in Sioux falls.
- In Arvada, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 37.0% in Sioux falls.
- Sioux falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Arvada.
- Arvada has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Sioux falls vs Arvada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sioux falls | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 78 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sioux falls vs Arvada
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sioux falls at 7% compared to 1% in Arvada.
- Sioux falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- Both Sioux falls and Arvada have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Arvada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 5% in Sioux falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arvada at 9%, compared to 6% in Sioux falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sioux falls at 2% compared to 0% in Arvada.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sioux falls | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sioux falls vs Arvada
- In Arvada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arvada at 20.9% versus 19.4% in Sioux falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sioux falls at 16.0% compared to 13.8% in Arvada.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 21.6% in Sioux falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sioux falls at 35.8% compared to 24.6% in Arvada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arvada at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sioux falls | Arvada |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,619) | 0.4% (483) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (26,548) | 12.7% (15,387) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (14,743) | 6.6% (8,032) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.3% (47,034) | 35.1% (42,624) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sioux falls vs Arvada
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux falls have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Arvada.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux falls hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 12.7% in Arvada.
- More residents in Sioux falls have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 6.6% in Arvada.
- In Arvada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 23.3% in Sioux falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.