Demographics details for Simms, TX vs Show low, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Simms, TX vs Show low, AZ.
| Data | Simms | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160 | 12,056 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $51,000 | $57,406 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Simms vs Show low
- The population in Show low is higher at 12,056, compared to 160 in Simms.
- The median age in Show low is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 39.0 years in Simms.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406, compared to $51,000 in Simms.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Simms at 60.0% compared to 44.0% in Show low.
- Simms has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Show low.
- The unemployment rate in Simms is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Simms vs Show low provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Simms | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Simms vs Show low
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Simms at 2% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Simms has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 70% in Show low.
- In Show low, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Simms.
- Show low has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Simms.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Show low at 9%, compared to 0% in Simms.
- In Show low, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Simms.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Simms | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Simms vs Show low
- In Show low, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Show low at 20.7% versus 0.0% in Simms.
- Show low has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Show low at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- Show low has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Show low at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Simms | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.3% (1,726) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.0% (844) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.1% (2,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Simms vs Show low
- In Show low, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- In Show low, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Show low at 7.0%, compared to 0.0% in Simms.
- In Show low, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Simms.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.