Demographics details for Simi valley, CA vs Mount olive, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Simi valley, CA vs Mount olive, MS.
Data | Simi valley | Mount olive |
---|---|---|
Population | 124,398 | 878 |
Median Age | 41.2 years | 31.7 years |
Median Income | $112,144 | $53,947 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Simi valley vs Mount olive
- In Simi valley, the population is higher at 124,398, compared to 878 in Mount olive.
- Residents in Simi valley have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 31.7 years in Mount olive.
- Simi valley has a higher median income of $112,144 compared to $53,947 in Mount olive.
- In Mount olive, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 42.0% in Simi valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Mount olive at 18%, compared to 8% in Simi valley.
- Mount olive has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Simi valley.
Demographics
Demographics Simi valley vs Mount olive provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Simi valley | Mount olive |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 120 |
White | 47 | 145 |
Asian | 12 | 2 |
Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Simi valley vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 120% compared to 1% in Simi valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount olive at 145% compared to 47% in Simi valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Simi valley at 12% compared to 2% in Mount olive.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Simi valley at 27% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Simi valley at 12% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Simi valley at 1% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Simi valley | Mount olive |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.3% |
Depression | 18.3% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 10.6% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 25.1% | 43.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Simi valley vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.6% in Simi valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount olive at 21.5% versus 18.3% in Simi valley.
- Mount olive has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 10.6% in Simi valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Simi valley at 17.6% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
- Mount olive has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 25.1% in Simi valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount olive at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Simi valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Simi valley | Mount olive |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,160) | 2.3% (20) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (16,296) | 23.9% (210) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (14,362) | 14.9% (131) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.9% (32,216) | 13.0% (114) |
Education Levels Comparison: Simi valley vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.9% in Simi valley.
- In Mount olive, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 13.1% in Simi valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount olive at 14.9%, compared to 11.5% in Simi valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Simi valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.9% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.