Demographics details for Silverhill, AL vs Pittsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Silverhill, AL vs Pittsburg, CA.
| Data | Silverhill | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,369 | 77,572 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $58,510 | $98,408 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Silverhill vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 77,572, compared to 1,369 in Silverhill.
- Residents in Silverhill have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $58,510 in Silverhill.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 26.0% in Silverhill.
- Silverhill has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Silverhill.
Demographics
Demographics Silverhill vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Silverhill | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 90 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Silverhill vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Silverhill.
- Silverhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Silverhill.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 7% in Silverhill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 14%, compared to 2% in Silverhill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Silverhill and Pittsburg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Silverhill | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 16.7% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Silverhill vs Pittsburg
- More residents in Silverhill report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Silverhill at 24.9% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Silverhill at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Silverhill at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Silverhill at 38.2% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsburg at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Silverhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Silverhill | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (28) | 3.1% (2,439) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (138) | 14.5% (11,263) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (74) | 23.3% (18,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (157) | 14.8% (11,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Silverhill vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.0% in Silverhill.
- In Pittsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 10.1% in Silverhill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 23.3%, compared to 5.4% in Silverhill.
- In Pittsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.5% in Silverhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.