Demographics details for Silt, CO vs Stoughton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Silt, CO vs Stoughton, WI.
| Data | Silt | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,594 | 12,846 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,450 | $73,014 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Silt vs Stoughton
- The population in Stoughton is higher at 12,846, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- The median age in Stoughton is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Stoughton has a higher median income of $73,014, compared to $72,450 in Silt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Silt at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Stoughton.
- The poverty level is higher in Stoughton at 9%, compared to 8% in Silt.
- The unemployment rate in Silt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Silt vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Silt | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 43 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Silt vs Stoughton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Silt and Stoughton at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoughton at 93% compared to 43% in Silt.
- Both Silt and Stoughton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Silt at 39% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Silt at 17% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Silt and Stoughton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Silt | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 24.5% |
| Obesity | 25.8% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Silt vs Stoughton
- More residents in Silt report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stoughton at 24.8% versus 23.2% in Silt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Silt at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Stoughton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 21.2% in Silt.
- Stoughton has higher obesity rates at 28.8% compared to 25.8% in Silt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stoughton at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Silt | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (79) | 0.4% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (409) | 14.4% (1,850) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (611) | 7.6% (981) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (397) | 25.2% (3,241) |
Education Levels Comparison: Silt vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Silt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.4% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- More residents in Silt have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 7.6% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.