Demographics details for Silt, CO vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Silt, CO vs Fort atkinson, WI.
| Data | Silt | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,594 | 12,412 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,450 | $72,215 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Silt vs Fort atkinson
- The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Silt has a higher median income of $72,450 compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Silt at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort atkinson at 9%, compared to 8% in Silt.
- The unemployment rate in Silt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Silt vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Silt | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 43 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Silt vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Silt at 1% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 43% in Silt.
- Both Silt and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Silt at 39% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Silt at 17% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Silt and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Silt | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 25.8% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Silt vs Fort atkinson
- More residents in Silt report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 23.2% in Silt.
- Fort atkinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in Silt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 21.2% in Silt.
- Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 25.8% in Silt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Silt | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (79) | 1.3% (160) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (409) | 20.8% (2,578) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (611) | 12.9% (1,595) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (397) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Silt vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of residents in Silt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
- In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- More residents in Silt have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.