Demographics details for Silt, CO vs Albert lea, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Silt, CO vs Albert lea, MN.
Data | Silt | Albert lea |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,594 | 18,396 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 44.2 years |
Median Income | $72,450 | $56,347 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Silt vs Albert lea
- The population in Albert lea is higher at 18,396, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- The median age in Albert lea is higher at 44.2 years, compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Silt has a higher median income of $72,450 compared to $56,347 in Albert lea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Silt at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Albert lea.
- The poverty level is higher in Albert lea at 10%, compared to 8% in Silt.
- The unemployment rate in Silt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Albert lea.
Demographics
Demographics Silt vs Albert lea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Silt | Albert lea |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 43 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 39 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Silt vs Albert lea
- In Albert lea, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Silt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Albert lea at 72% compared to 43% in Silt.
- In Albert lea, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Silt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Silt at 39% compared to 15% in Albert lea.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Silt at 17% compared to 8% in Albert lea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Silt and Albert lea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Silt | Albert lea |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.3% |
Depression | 23.2% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 22.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 25.8% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Silt vs Albert lea
- In Albert lea, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Silt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Albert lea at 24.2% versus 23.2% in Silt.
- Albert lea has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 15.5% in Silt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Silt at 21.2% compared to 18.3% in Albert lea.
- Albert lea has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 25.8% in Silt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Albert lea at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Silt | Albert lea |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (79) | 2.0% (370) |
High School Diploma | 11.4% (409) | 19.7% (3,624) |
Less than High School | 17.0% (611) | 20.0% (3,680) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (397) | 11.3% (2,086) |
Education Levels Comparison: Silt vs Albert lea
- A higher percentage of residents in Silt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 2.0% in Albert lea.
- In Albert lea, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Albert lea at 20.0%, compared to 17.0% in Silt.
- In Albert lea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.