Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Washington, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Washington, LA.
| Data | Siloam springs | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,654 | 726 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 26.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,911 | $36,719 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Washington
- In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 726 in Washington.
- Residents in Siloam springs have a higher median age of 30.1 years compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
- Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $36,719 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 23.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 15%, compared to 13% in Siloam springs.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics Siloam springs vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Siloam springs | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 65 |
| White | 50 | 20 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 12 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 20% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 3% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 12% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Siloam springs | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Siloam springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 25.5% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 21.6% in Siloam springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 15.1% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Siloam springs | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (681) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (2,510) | 20.2% (147) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (3,249) | 27.7% (201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (2,680) | 7.3% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.0% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 27.7%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 7.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.