Environment details: Siloam springs AR
Moderate quality, seasonal variations expected.
Environment details: Shepherd MT
Good quality, water tests show minimal issues.
Compare Environment: Siloam springs AR vs Shepherd MT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Siloam springs | Shepherd |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 496 | 228 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality, seasonal variations expected. | Good quality, water tests show minimal issues. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.61 | 1.8 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 13 | 38 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Siloam springs vs Shepherd
- The water quality in Shepherd is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Siloam springs.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Shepherd with an average index of 1.8 compared to 1.61 in Siloam springs.
- Shepherd experiences more days with poor air quality at 38 compared to 13 in Siloam springs.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.