Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Rockwood, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Rockwood, TN.

Data Siloam springs Rockwood
Population 18,654 5,538
Median Age 30.1 years 45.5 years
Median Income $59,911 $43,309
Married Families 38.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Rockwood

  • In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 5,538 in Rockwood.
  • The median age in Rockwood is higher at 45.5 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $43,309 in Rockwood.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Rockwood.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rockwood at 15%, compared to 13% in Siloam springs.
  • Rockwood has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Rockwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Rockwood
Black 1 Data is updating
White 50 92
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 23 1
Two or More Races 20 5
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Rockwood

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Siloam springs at 1% compared to 0% in Rockwood.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockwood at 92% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Rockwood.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 1% in Rockwood.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 5% in Rockwood.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Rockwood.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Rockwood
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 21.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 15.9%
Depression 26.0% 29.7%
Smoking 21.6% 27.1%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 14.7%
Obesity 39.2% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Rockwood

  • In Rockwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 20.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rockwood at 29.7% versus 26.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Rockwood has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 21.6% in Siloam springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Siloam springs at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Rockwood.
  • Rockwood has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockwood at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Rockwood
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.6% (35)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 24.6% (1,364)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 16.5% (915)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 7.8% (430)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Rockwood

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.6% in Rockwood.
  • In Rockwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents in Siloam springs have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 16.5% in Rockwood.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 7.8% in Rockwood.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.