Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Plainfield, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Plainfield, NJ.

Data Siloam springs Plainfield
Population 18,654 54,513
Median Age 30.1 years 33.1 years
Median Income $59,911 $70,712
Married Families 38.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 13% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Plainfield

  • The population in Plainfield is higher at 54,513, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
  • The median age in Plainfield is higher at 33.1 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Plainfield has a higher median income of $70,712, compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Plainfield.
  • Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Plainfield.
  • Plainfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Plainfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Plainfield
Black 1 36
White 50 1
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 23 52
Two or More Races 20 9
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Plainfield

  • In Plainfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 1% in Plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Plainfield.
  • Plainfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 23% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 9% in Plainfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Plainfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Plainfield
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 14.2%
Depression 26.0% 16.9%
Smoking 21.6% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 14.3%
Obesity 39.2% 36.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Plainfield

  • More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Plainfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 16.9% in Plainfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 18.5% in Plainfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Siloam springs at 14.9% compared to 14.3% in Plainfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 36.0% in Plainfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Plainfield
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 2.5% (1,370)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 16.5% (8,983)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 28.3% (15,417)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 14.3% (7,782)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Plainfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.5% in Plainfield.
  • In Plainfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Plainfield at 28.3%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 14.3% in Plainfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.