Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Otsego, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Otsego, MI.
Data | Siloam springs | Otsego |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,654 | 4,069 |
Median Age | 30.1 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $59,911 | $68,490 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Otsego
- In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 4,069 in Otsego.
- The median age in Otsego is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Otsego has a higher median income of $68,490, compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
- In Otsego, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Otsego.
- The unemployment rate in Siloam springs is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Otsego.
Demographics
Demographics Siloam springs vs Otsego provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Siloam springs | Otsego |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 50 | 85 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 23 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 20 | 10 |
American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Otsego
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Siloam springs at 1% compared to 0% in Otsego.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Otsego at 85% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Otsego.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 3% in Otsego.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 10% in Otsego.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Otsego.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Siloam springs | Otsego |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.8% |
Depression | 26.0% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Otsego
- More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Otsego.
- Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 25.2% in Otsego.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 19.8% in Otsego.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Otsego at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 38.8% in Otsego.
- Disability percentages are higher in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Otsego.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Siloam springs | Otsego |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.7% (681) | 1.8% (73) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (2,510) | 24.4% (994) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (3,249) | 20.9% (852) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (2,680) | 7.2% (291) |
Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Otsego
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.8% in Otsego.
- In Otsego, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Otsego at 20.9%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 7.2% in Otsego.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.