Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Lamesa, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Lamesa, TX.
| Data | Siloam springs | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,654 | 8,425 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $59,911 | $39,434 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Lamesa
- In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- The median age in Lamesa is higher at 33.1 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- The poverty level is higher in Lamesa at 18%, compared to 13% in Siloam springs.
- Lamesa has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics Siloam springs vs Lamesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Siloam springs | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 50 | 5 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 73 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 19 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 23% in Siloam springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 19% in Lamesa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Siloam springs | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Lamesa
- More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.7% in Lamesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 24.0% in Lamesa.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Siloam springs and Lamesa at 21.6%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lamesa at 15.6% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Lamesa has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Siloam springs | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (681) | 3.3% (278) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (2,510) | 18.4% (1,547) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (3,249) | 34.2% (2,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (2,680) | 8.7% (736) |
Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Lamesa
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 3.3% in Lamesa.
- In Lamesa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lamesa at 34.2%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.