Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Hazel crest, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Hazel crest, IL.

Data Siloam springs Hazel crest
Population 18,654 12,897
Median Age 30.1 years 33.0 years
Median Income $59,911 $57,247
Married Families 38.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 13% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Hazel crest

  • In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 12,897 in Hazel crest.
  • The median age in Hazel crest is higher at 33.0 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $57,247 in Hazel crest.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 21.0% in Hazel crest.
  • Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Hazel crest.
  • Hazel crest has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Hazel crest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Hazel crest
Black 1 92
White 50 -2
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 6
Two or More Races 20 4
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Hazel crest

  • In Hazel crest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 92% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to -2% in Hazel crest.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Hazel crest.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 6% in Hazel crest.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 4% in Hazel crest.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Hazel crest.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Hazel crest
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 11.1%
Depression 26.0% 14.9%
Smoking 21.6% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 14.7%
Obesity 39.2% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Hazel crest

  • More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Hazel crest.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 14.9% in Hazel crest.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 15.6% in Hazel crest.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Siloam springs at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Hazel crest.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 39.1% in Hazel crest.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel crest at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Hazel crest
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.6% (79)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 15.8% (2,042)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 4.9% (636)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 18.6% (2,400)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Hazel crest

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.6% in Hazel crest.
  • In Hazel crest, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents in Siloam springs have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 4.9% in Hazel crest.
  • In Hazel crest, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.