Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Crawfordsville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Crawfordsville, IN.

Data Siloam springs Crawfordsville
Population 18,654 16,479
Median Age 30.1 years 36.7 years
Median Income $59,911 $46,918
Married Families 38.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 13% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Crawfordsville

  • In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
  • The median age in Crawfordsville is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Siloam springs and Crawfordsville at 13%.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Siloam springs and Crawfordsville at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Crawfordsville
Black 1 1
White 50 84
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 23 8
Two or More Races 20 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Crawfordsville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Siloam springs and Crawfordsville at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawfordsville at 84% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 8% in Crawfordsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 6% in Crawfordsville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Crawfordsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Crawfordsville
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 12.9%
Depression 26.0% 26.1%
Smoking 21.6% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 16.6%
Obesity 39.2% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Crawfordsville

  • More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 26.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 21.6% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawfordsville at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Crawfordsville
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.7% (114)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 23.1% (3,814)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 19.9% (3,274)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 10.4% (1,714)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • In Crawfordsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.