Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Concord, CA.
| Data | Siloam springs | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,654 | 122,625 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,911 | $107,789 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics Siloam springs vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Siloam springs | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 50 | 33 |
| Asian | 3 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 16 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Concord
- In Concord, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 33% in Concord.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 3% in Siloam springs.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 23% in Siloam springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 16% in Concord.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Concord.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Siloam springs | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Concord
- More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.0% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Siloam springs | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (681) | 1.8% (2,147) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (2,510) | 13.0% (15,969) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (3,249) | 15.7% (19,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (2,680) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Concord
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.8% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- More residents in Siloam springs have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 15.7% in Concord.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.