Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Clarkesville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Clarkesville, GA.

Data Siloam springs Clarkesville
Population 18,654 2,112
Median Age 30.1 years 47.4 years
Median Income $59,911 $64,848
Married Families 38.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Clarkesville

  • In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
  • The median age in Clarkesville is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848, compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • The unemployment rate in Siloam springs is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Clarkesville
Black 1 8
White 50 81
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 23 4
Two or More Races 20 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Clarkesville

  • In Clarkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarkesville at 81% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 1% in Clarkesville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Clarkesville
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 12.6%
Depression 26.0% 23.6%
Smoking 21.6% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 16.3%
Obesity 39.2% 31.5%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Clarkesville

  • More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 23.6% in Clarkesville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 18.4% in Clarkesville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Clarkesville
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.3% (6)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 16.9% (356)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 15.2% (322)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 21.4% (453)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Clarkesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
  • In Clarkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents in Siloam springs have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
  • In Clarkesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.