Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Beaverton, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Beaverton, OR.

Data Siloam springs Beaverton
Population 18,654 97,053
Median Age 30.1 years 36.7 years
Median Income $59,911 $88,899
Married Families 38.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 13% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Beaverton

  • The population in Beaverton is higher at 97,053, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
  • The median age in Beaverton is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899, compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Siloam springs and Beaverton at 38.0%.
  • Siloam springs has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 7% in Beaverton.
  • Beaverton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Beaverton
Black 1 3
White 50 57
Asian 3 12
Hispanic 23 18
Two or More Races 20 10
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Beaverton

  • In Beaverton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverton at 57% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • In Beaverton, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 3% in Siloam springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 18% in Beaverton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 10% in Beaverton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Beaverton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Beaverton
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 9.3%
Depression 26.0% 22.9%
Smoking 21.6% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 16.6%
Obesity 39.2% 31.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Beaverton

  • More residents in Siloam springs report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 26.0% compared to 22.9% in Beaverton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Siloam springs at 21.6% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaverton at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Siloam springs at 39.2% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Beaverton
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.6% (619)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 9.8% (9,471)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 7.2% (7,010)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 34.9% (33,872)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Beaverton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
  • More residents in Siloam springs have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
  • In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.