Demographics details for Sikeston, MO vs Wallace, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sikeston, MO vs Wallace, SC.
| Data | Sikeston | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,073 | 662 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 59.8 years |
| Median Income | $47,464 | $19,423 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sikeston vs Wallace
- In Sikeston, the population is higher at 16,073, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- The median age in Wallace is higher at 59.8 years, compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher median income of $47,464 compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sikeston at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- The poverty level is higher in Wallace at 22%, compared to 16% in Sikeston.
- Wallace has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Sikeston vs Wallace provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sikeston | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 42 |
| White | 65 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Sikeston vs Wallace
- In Wallace, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 25% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- Both Sikeston and Wallace have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sikeston at 3% compared to 0% in Wallace.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wallace at 10%, compared to 7% in Sikeston.
- In Wallace, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Sikeston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sikeston | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sikeston vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.8% in Sikeston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sikeston at 24.6% compared to 22.5% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 23.9% in Sikeston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sikeston at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Wallace has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 39.0% in Sikeston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 20.0% in Sikeston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sikeston | Wallace |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (76) | 1.5% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (3,696) | 57.4% (380) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (2,142) | 28.2% (187) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,619) | 1.1% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sikeston vs Wallace
- In Wallace, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- In Wallace, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 57.4% compared to 23.0% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wallace at 28.2%, compared to 13.3% in Sikeston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.