Demographics details for Sikeston, MO vs Norwalk, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sikeston, MO vs Norwalk, CT.
| Data | Sikeston | Norwalk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,073 | 91,401 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $47,464 | $97,879 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Sikeston vs Norwalk
- The population in Norwalk is higher at 91,401, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- The median age in Norwalk is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Norwalk has a higher median income of $97,879, compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- In Norwalk, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 8% in Norwalk.
- The unemployment rate in Sikeston is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.6% in Norwalk.
Demographics
Demographics Sikeston vs Norwalk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sikeston | Norwalk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 18 |
| White | 65 | 35 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 31 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sikeston vs Norwalk
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sikeston at 25% compared to 18% in Norwalk.
- Sikeston has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 35% in Norwalk.
- In Norwalk, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Sikeston.
- Norwalk has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 31%, compared to 3% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norwalk at 12%, compared to 7% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sikeston and Norwalk at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sikeston | Norwalk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 25.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sikeston vs Norwalk
- More residents in Sikeston report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.0% in Norwalk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sikeston at 24.6% compared to 17.8% in Norwalk.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sikeston at 23.9% compared to 12.2% in Norwalk.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norwalk at 16.3% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sikeston at 39.0% compared to 25.9% in Norwalk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Norwalk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sikeston | Norwalk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (76) | 2.1% (1,895) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (3,696) | 13.8% (12,648) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (2,142) | 15.1% (13,786) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,619) | 30.8% (28,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sikeston vs Norwalk
- In Norwalk, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 13.8% in Norwalk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norwalk at 15.1%, compared to 13.3% in Sikeston.
- In Norwalk, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.8% compared to 16.3% in Sikeston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.