Demographics details for Sikeston, MO vs Fedscreek, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sikeston, MO vs Fedscreek, KY.

Data Sikeston Fedscreek
Population 16,073 3,563
Median Age 37.3 years 38.2 years
Median Income $47,464 $37,431
Married Families 36.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 16% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.7

Population Comparison: Sikeston vs Fedscreek

  • In Sikeston, the population is higher at 16,073, compared to 3,563 in Fedscreek.
  • The median age in Fedscreek is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
  • Sikeston has a higher median income of $47,464 compared to $37,431 in Fedscreek.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Sikeston and Fedscreek at 36.0%.
  • Sikeston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Fedscreek.
  • Fedscreek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.

Demographics

Demographics Sikeston vs Fedscreek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sikeston Fedscreek
Black 25 1
White 65 94
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sikeston vs Fedscreek

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sikeston at 25% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fedscreek at 94% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
  • Both Sikeston and Fedscreek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sikeston at 3% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sikeston at 7% compared to 4% in Fedscreek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sikeston and Fedscreek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sikeston Fedscreek
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 14.7% Data is updating%
Depression 24.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 23.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sikeston vs Fedscreek

  • More residents in Sikeston report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sikeston at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sikeston at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sikeston at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sikeston at 39.0% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fedscreek at 33.0% compared to 20.0% in Sikeston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sikeston Fedscreek
No Schooling 0.5% (76) 3.6% (129)
High School Diploma 23.0% (3,696) 22.2% (791)
Less than High School 13.3% (2,142) 42.4% (1,510)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.3% (2,619) 6.9% (245)

Education Levels Comparison: Sikeston vs Fedscreek

  • In Fedscreek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 22.2% in Fedscreek.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fedscreek at 42.4%, compared to 13.3% in Sikeston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 6.9% in Fedscreek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.