Demographics details for Sikeston, MO vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sikeston, MO vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Sikeston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,073 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,464 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sikeston vs Cudahy
- The population in Cudahy is higher at 17,796, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592, compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- In Cudahy, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Sikeston vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sikeston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 3 |
| White | 65 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sikeston vs Cudahy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sikeston at 25% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cudahy at 77% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
- In Cudahy, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sikeston.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 7% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sikeston and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sikeston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sikeston vs Cudahy
- More residents in Sikeston report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sikeston at 24.6% compared to 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sikeston at 23.9% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sikeston at 39.0% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Cudahy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sikeston | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (76) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (3,696) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (2,142) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,619) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sikeston vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 23.0% in Sikeston.
- More residents in Sikeston have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 16.3% in Sikeston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.