Demographics details for Sikeston, MO vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sikeston, MO vs Aulander, NC.
| Data | Sikeston | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,073 | 727 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,464 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Sikeston vs Aulander
- In Sikeston, the population is higher at 16,073, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher median income of $47,464 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sikeston at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Sikeston has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Sikeston vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sikeston | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 61 |
| White | 65 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sikeston vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 25% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- Both Sikeston and Aulander have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sikeston at 3% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sikeston at 7% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sikeston and Aulander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sikeston | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sikeston vs Aulander
- More residents in Sikeston report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.2% in Aulander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sikeston at 24.6% compared to 23.5% in Aulander.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Sikeston and Aulander at 23.9%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sikeston at 15.8% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 39.0% in Sikeston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Aulander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sikeston | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (76) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (3,696) | 13.3% (97) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (2,142) | 28.5% (207) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,619) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sikeston vs Aulander
- A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 13.3% in Sikeston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sikeston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.