Demographics details for Sierra vista, AZ vs Philadelphia, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sierra vista, AZ vs Philadelphia, PA.

Data Sierra vista Philadelphia
Population 45,439 1,567,258
Median Age 37.0 years 34.8 years
Median Income $70,899 $57,537
Married Families 42.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 13% 25%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Sierra vista vs Philadelphia

  • The population in Philadelphia is higher at 1,567,258, compared to 45,439 in Sierra vista.
  • Residents in Sierra vista have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.8 years in Philadelphia.
  • Sierra vista has a higher median income of $70,899 compared to $57,537 in Philadelphia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sierra vista at 42.0% compared to 26.0% in Philadelphia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Philadelphia at 25%, compared to 13% in Sierra vista.
  • Philadelphia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Sierra vista.

Demographics

Demographics Sierra vista vs Philadelphia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sierra vista Philadelphia
Black 8 41
White 48 29
Asian 4 8
Hispanic 24 16
Two or More Races 15 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sierra vista vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 8% in Sierra vista.
  • Sierra vista has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 29% in Philadelphia.
  • In Philadelphia, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 4% in Sierra vista.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sierra vista at 24% compared to 16% in Philadelphia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sierra vista at 15% compared to 6% in Philadelphia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sierra vista at 1% compared to 0% in Philadelphia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sierra vista Philadelphia
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.8%
Depression 20.8% 21.0%
Smoking 15.8% 18.9%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 16.9%
Obesity 32.2% 31.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sierra vista vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.4% in Sierra vista.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Philadelphia at 21.0% versus 20.8% in Sierra vista.
  • Philadelphia has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Sierra vista.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sierra vista at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Philadelphia.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sierra vista at 32.2% compared to 31.3% in Philadelphia.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Philadelphia at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Sierra vista.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sierra vista Philadelphia
No Schooling 0.5% (224) 1.5% (23,668)
High School Diploma 11.7% (5,296) 18.3% (287,402)
Less than High School 8.2% (3,735) 13.3% (207,719)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.8% (10,354) 23.4% (366,310)

Education Levels Comparison: Sierra vista vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Sierra vista.
  • In Philadelphia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 11.7% in Sierra vista.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Philadelphia at 13.3%, compared to 8.2% in Sierra vista.
  • In Philadelphia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 22.8% in Sierra vista.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.