Demographics details for Sierra vista, AZ vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sierra vista, AZ vs Harker heights, TX.

Data Sierra vista Harker heights
Population 45,439 34,102
Median Age 37.0 years 34.5 years
Median Income $70,899 $72,258
Married Families 42.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Sierra vista vs Harker heights

  • In Sierra vista, the population is higher at 45,439, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
  • Residents in Sierra vista have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $70,899 in Sierra vista.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sierra vista at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • Sierra vista has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Sierra vista.

Demographics

Demographics Sierra vista vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sierra vista Harker heights
Black 8 28
White 48 36
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 24 21
Two or More Races 15 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Sierra vista vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 8% in Sierra vista.
  • Sierra vista has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sierra vista at 4% compared to 3% in Harker heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sierra vista at 24% compared to 21% in Harker heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sierra vista at 15% compared to 11% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sierra vista and Harker heights at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sierra vista Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.8%
Depression 20.8% 22.5%
Smoking 15.8% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 17.1%
Obesity 32.2% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sierra vista vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.4% in Sierra vista.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 20.8% in Sierra vista.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sierra vista at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sierra vista at 18.2% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.2% in Sierra vista.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sierra vista at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sierra vista Harker heights
No Schooling 0.5% (224) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 11.7% (5,296) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 8.2% (3,735) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.8% (10,354) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: Sierra vista vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Sierra vista.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sierra vista hold a high school diploma at 11.7% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 8.2% in Sierra vista.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sierra vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.