Demographics details for Shunk, PA vs Longview, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shunk, PA vs Longview, WA.
| Data | Shunk | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88 | 37,782 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $57,920 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Shunk vs Longview
- The population in Longview is higher at 37,782, compared to 88 in Shunk.
- Residents in Shunk have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Longview.
- Shunk has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $57,920 in Longview.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shunk at 55.0% compared to 33.0% in Longview.
- The poverty level is higher in Longview at 12%, compared to 10% in Shunk.
- Longview has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Shunk.
Demographics
Demographics Shunk vs Longview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shunk | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 90 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shunk vs Longview
- In Longview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Shunk.
- Shunk has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 76% in Longview.
- In Longview, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Shunk.
- Longview has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Shunk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Longview at 10%, compared to 5% in Shunk.
- In Longview, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Shunk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shunk | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shunk vs Longview
- In Longview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Longview at 29.4% versus 0.0% in Shunk.
- Longview has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Longview at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Longview has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Longview at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shunk | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (494) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.2% (6,511) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.1% (5,701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.0% (4,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shunk vs Longview
- In Longview, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- In Longview, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Longview at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- In Longview, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.