Demographics details for Shumway, IL vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shumway, IL vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Shumway | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 182 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,750 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Shumway vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 182 in Shumway.
- The median age in Greenville is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 32.0 years in Shumway.
- Shumway has a higher median income of $83,750 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shumway at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 7% in Shumway.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.2% in Shumway.
Demographics
Demographics Shumway vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shumway | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 87 |
| White | 90 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shumway vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 0% in Shumway.
- Shumway has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Shumway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shumway at 5% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shumway at 5% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shumway and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shumway | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shumway vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.2% in Shumway.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 21.2%.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 14.9% in Shumway.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shumway at 18.8% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 34.2% in Shumway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Shumway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shumway | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (42) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (16) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (15) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shumway vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Shumway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shumway hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 20.2% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenville at 15.5%, compared to 8.8% in Shumway.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 8.2% in Shumway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.