Demographics details for Shrub oak, NY vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shrub oak, NY vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Shrub oak | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,002 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $128,832 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shrub oak vs Richland
- The population in Richland is higher at 7,297, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- The median age in Richland is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Richland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Shrub oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Shrub oak.
Demographics
Demographics Shrub oak vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shrub oak | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 19 |
| White | 64 | 74 |
| Asian | 15 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richland at 74% compared to 64% in Shrub oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Shrub oak at 15% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shrub oak at 18% compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richland at 2%, compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shrub oak and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shrub oak | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 25.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shrub oak | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (13) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (330) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (387) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (1,168) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shrub oak vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- More residents in Shrub oak have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shrub oak hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.