Demographics details for Shrub oak, NY vs Lancaster, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shrub oak, NY vs Lancaster, PA.
| Data | Shrub oak | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,002 | 57,453 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $128,832 | $61,014 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Shrub oak vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 57,453, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- Residents in Shrub oak have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832 compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shrub oak at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Shrub oak.
Demographics
Demographics Shrub oak vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shrub oak | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 64 | 24 |
| Asian | 15 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 24% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Shrub oak at 15% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 18% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shrub oak and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shrub oak | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 25.7% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 21.8% versus 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 14.9% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shrub oak | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (13) | 1.9% (1,077) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (330) | 16.7% (9,588) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (387) | 18.6% (10,712) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (1,168) | 17.4% (10,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shrub oak vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 18.6%, compared to 12.9% in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shrub oak hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 17.4% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.